The Supreme Court is facing a new request to pause limits imposed by the Trump administration on White House access to social media users who request it. The action comes from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), a Washington DC-based public interest research group, who filed an emergency motion this week.
EPIC’s motion argues that the limits on social media requests are an assault on our democracy. The limit at the heart of this case was established last August when the White House announced that it will no longer accept requests via third-party websites or online forms for invitations to the White House for social media postings.
At the time, many argued that the changes would impose a disproportionate burden on minority communities and those who are less tech-savvy. EPIC’s argument is that the limits have a significant, particularly chilling impact on people’s ability to exercise their right to free speech and access to information.
The motion filed with the Supreme Court asks for a stay pending a review of the constitutionality of the policy. EPIC is asking for the justices to halt the policy until the underlying legal issues can be reviewed and litigated in court.
EPIC is particularly worried about the policy’s potential impact on the November election and the ability of the public to see the different views of candidates on the issues. They argue that the limitations imposed by the White House stifle public discourse, furthering the potential for mis- and disinformation.
The Supreme Court’s decision on this motion could have a profound effect on the political discourse in this country. This case highlights the crucial importance of freedom of expression and access to vital information and how important it is for all of us to fight for our right to it.
