For those who oppose the idea of a third party, or “No-Labels” approach to the 2016 Presidential elections, the issue has become a heated one. Despite the increasing amount of discussion about a third party candidate from either the Republican or Democratic party, many organization are actively fighting against it. These organizations have recently launched a series of television ads that argue for an established two-party system in the 2015 Presidential election.
Much of their argument revolves around the idea that, while a third party might appear to offer a greater choice of values and viewpoints to prospective voters, it might also cause harm by splitting the already divided body politic further, ultimately paving the way for a candidate who is “far too extreme” for a majority of Americans. The ads feature several people citing both the practical and rhetorical issues associated with a third party approach.
Another key point of debate amongst opponents of the “No-Labels” and other third party bids is that it could potentially “discourage current party supporters and dilute the overall power — and legitimacy — of their chosen parties.” Critics hold that by allowing for more competition within parties, the two traditional political entities become less powerful and could even lead to the eventual dissolution of the two-party system.
Whether or not these so-called “anti-third party” advocates succeed in their mission remains to be seen. Although the newly launched ads are garnering a good degree of attention, the issue is sure to remain contentious in the coming months as we approach the start of the 2016 Presidential election.
